| World first as Government Senators publish Mobile Phone Labelling Legislation to warn of potential dangers to Children |
|
|
|
| Written by MD | ||||||
| Wednesday, 14 July 2010 10:32 | ||||||
|
World first as Government Senators publish Mobile Phone Labelling Legislation to warn of potential dangers to Children Legislation published by 3 government senators, Senator Mark Daly (Fianna Fail), Senator Niall O Brolchain (Green Party) and Senator Mark Dearey (Green Party) has been placed on the Senate Order Paper as a private members motion. When passed it will make Ireland the first country in the World to enact Legislation to warn of dangers of mobile phones to children On May 6, 2010, the President’s of the United States Cancer Panel reported that “the true A top neurosurgeon in Australia Vini Khurana says the worlds heavy reliance on mobile phones could be a greater threat to human health than smoking and even asbestos. EU Professor Jacqueline McGlade executive director of the European Environmental Agency (EEA) (an independent Agency with "legal autonomy" maintaining close links with the EU Community Institutions and members states ) said "Recent research and reviews on the long term effect of radiation from mobile telecommunications suggest that it would be prudent for health authorities to recommend actions to reduce exposures, especially to vulnerable groups as children" European Environmental Agency (EEA) "Appropriate, precautionary and proportionate actions taken now to avoid plausible and potentially serious threats to health from EMF are likely to be seen as prudent and wise from future prespectives. We must remember that precaution is one of the principals of the EU environmental policy" Sweden Professor Lennart Hardell in Sweden found significant increased risk of brain tumours from ten or more years of cell phone use with the risk of brain cancer increasing by 5 percent; for every year of cell phone use the risk of brain cancer increases by 8 percent; after ten years or more years of digital cell phone use, there was a 280 percent increased risk of brain cancer; and for digital cell phone users who were teenagers or younger when they first started using cell phones, there was a 420 percent increased risk of cancer. This suggests that the two highest risks are ten or more years of cell phone use and the cell phone was held on the same side of the head where the tumour was diagnosed. Finally, the telecommunications industry, on the one hand, disputes the non-thermal risk of cell phones, but yet, their user manuals warn customers to keep cell phone away from the body even when the cell phone is not in use. Are these industry members erring on the side of caution or are the warnings an implicit admission that a health hazard exists? For example, Nokia 1100 warns: "This product meets RF exposure guidelines . . . when positioned at least 1.5 cm (about 1 inch) away from the body . . . and should position the product at least 1.5 cm away from your body."
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.25
3.25 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |
||||||
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 July 2010 10:35 ) | ||||||




